WHY USE PHOTOGRAMMETRY TO BUILD 3D MODELS OF INDOOR SPACES?
If you read this blog post, you are probably familiar with drone-based photogrammetry and the numerous use cases for outdoor mapping. This is certainly less true if we speak about indoor environments. The Flyability Elios 2 enables drone-based photogrammetry indoor and in inaccessible places, we wanted to explore the reasons to use photogrammetry for indoor 3D modeling. This is the subject of this blog post. Part or all of this article originally appeared on Flyability.com. Read the original article here.
If you are interested to learn more, read our second article related to this topic: Building indoor 3D models: how to capture and process photogrammetry data with Elios 2.
Why photogrammetry indoors?
There are certainly many reasons to use photogrammetry indoors. Here are recurrent themes that we came across while interviewing our customer about their asset management and surveying activities.
I ) Organizing your data
Considering the complete workflow for drone-based visual inspection, data acquisition is only a first step. In a second step, the data must be analyzed to extract useful information. With Elios 1 and Elios 2, the pilot can record points of interest (POIs) during the flight and easily find them in the video stream using Inspector, Flyability’s desktop software. However, the pilot may have overlooked some defects or objects of interest, and it is therefore common to carefully review the videos after a series of flights. Also, it is often crucial to understand where the data was acquired, and localize the POIs on blueprints or CAD models. Usually, this is achieved by watching the video again and building a mental map of the asset (keep in mind that indoor datasets do not contain geolocalization information). To determine the position of POIs, it is sometimes required to count repeating elements such as beams, welds, intersections, or other obvious visual features. This method works, but is cumbersome and not really scaleable.
In some situations, 3D modeling can drastically simplify this tedious and time-consuming task. With a 3D model and the trajectory of the drone, it is much easier to navigate in the dataset, to review only the relevant images and to understand the location of the POIs. The risk of errors – such as confusing repeating elements – decreases and the overall understanding of the asset geometry becomes clearer.
II ) Making measurements
Visual information is often the starting point of all type of inspection, but being able to put a number on visual features is often crucial to help the decision-making process. By focusing data capture efforts on a small part of an asset, it is possible to build a local 3D model that offers great details and accuracy. For example, Elios 2 takes images with a Ground Sampling Distance (GSD) down to 0.18 mm/px (0.007 in/px) when capturing data at a 30 cm (11.8 in) distance. This resolution offers great perspectives for photogrammetry software, such as Pix4D Mapper, to build very precise 3D models.
As Alex Buczkowski reminds us in his blog post “How accurate is your drone survey?”, it is very important to include objects with known dimensions in the model. This allows to scale the model accurately, even without ground control points. It is then possible to measure objects or defects on the original images, and to visualize them in the 3D model.
III ) Checking the shape and condition of structures – the case for mining
This application is very specific and it deserves its place here as it will certainly inspire other industries with similar problems. Underground mining consists mainly in excavating large volumes of ore from the entrails of the earth to then extract various minerals through chemical refining processes, for instance. The excavation leaves large openings called stopes. These stopes are extremely dangerous areas, where no humans are allowed.
After blasting the ore body, the ore is extracted from the bottom, in a similar fashion to a cereal dispenser. Geotechnical engineers are in charge of ensuring the underground workings – such as stopes, galleries, shafts, and raises – are stable and they don’t fall down on the miners. To complete their tasks, geotechnical engineers need to understand the shape (3D model) and condition (visual information) of these workings. Photogrammetry successfully combines 3D model reconstruction with visual information and solves many of their problems. 3D models of stopes give access to a whole new level of information about these areas where the risk of being smashed by rocks the size of a car is not negligible.
IV ) Tracking changes
The classic example of asset management is of course tracking how the conditions of an asset, and more particularly defects, evolve over time. This allows the planning of preventive maintenance and repairs before any defect becomes an actual threat to the asset operation. This is something that doesn’t necessarily require to make a full new digital twin of the asset in outdoor use cases, since GPS and orientation information can be sufficient to know where to retake a picture. For the indoor use case, or more generally GPS-denied environments, making a 3D model is the only option as the drone doesn’t have localization information while it’s flying.
V ) Planning maintenance and design changes
Digital twins are not only useful to track defects over time and decide when it’s time to tackle them. They are also helpful in the planning phase of maintenance and design changes. The digital twin allows to plan where to put scaffolding, and how the area should be accessed. When a large new piece of equipment needs to be moved through a plant, a traversability analysis can be performed to find the optimal route. For design changes as well, it is indispensable to have an up-to-date 3D model to design and visualize the new changes.
VI ) Training and safety
Complex and dangerous assets often require extensive training of new personnel on the layout of the factory, before they can take part in operations. A classic example here is nuclear industry. To plan escape routes in case of emergency situations they need up to date floor plans in all parts of the asset. Here again a digital twin of the asset proves to be helpful. In such application the photogrammetry model is often annotated with loads of additional information about the asset.
Where does it work? What can I map?
Let’s dive in with a small refresher on the conditions that we face when capturing a photogrammetry dataset indoors.
The case of indoor: What about GPS, light, and cluttered spaces?
First, the absence of GPS signal means that the images cannot be geolocated – the reconstruction relies only on the visual content of the images. Second, the environments are often pitch dark. Artificial lighting is needed, but most often it cannot be easily installed in the area of interest. Therefore we rely solely on the on-board lighting system of the drone. The last important difference with outdoor photogrammetry is the spatial constraint: indoors, the spaces are often narrow and cluttered. This puts a constraint on the possible trajectories to cover the area of interest.
Being built for the indoor, Elios 2 can address these challenges. Thanks to its unobstructed view and powerful onboard lighting system, it captures high-quality images that are suited for photogrammetry even in the darkest environments. Recording 4K videos, it collects enough data to allow for 3D reconstruction even without a GPS Finally, the protective cage of Elios 2 allows it to fly in the most cluttered spaces without risking to crash. This is of tremendous importance when you try to map a narrow area. With Elios 2, you can concentrate on the data you capture, without fearing to collide onto objects, even during backwards or sidewards motions.
What are the easy places to map? Where is it more challenging?
There are two key aspects that determine the difficulty to map an asset: the image content and the flight trajectory.
Photogrammetry works in environments that have a sufficient quantity of visual features. A visual feature is any point that is distinctive enough to be recognized by a photogrammetry algorithm. Note that visual features depend on the scale. Some surfaces appear homogeneous from a given distance, but many features become visible as you come closer.
|Favorable Environments||Challenging Environments|
|Natural rocks||Concrete wall with high uniformity|
|Brick walls||Homogenous and/or shiny painting|
|Old painting, cracks, corrosion||Shiny metallic surface, stainless steel|
|Dirty surfaces, algae||Glass, windows|
The geometry of the asset is also an important factor for the success of a 3D reconstruction. While it is rather easy to scan a flat wall in a regular pattern, finding an appropriate trajectory becomes much more difficult in assets with complex geometries. Here are a few points to consider:
|Favorable Asset Geometries||Challenging Asset Geometries|
|Large assets that allow flying separate lines to cover the same areas from different angles.||Linear assets such as ducts, sewers or narrow chimneys with less than 2m diameter. There, the images are essentially gathered along a single line. As a consequence, objects are observed from a reduced number of angles, providing a weaker geometry for the reconstruction.|
|Assets comprising a single volume (such as cylindrical or spherical tanks, large chimneys, boilers, etc.) where all parts of the assets can be more or less seen from everywhere in the asset.||Assets split into several volumes, connected by manholes, corridors, or narrow passages. It is very difficult to keep a proper connection between the images taken on both sides of a manhole, a door, or at the opening of a corridor into a larger room.|
|Assets containing long linear features (such as welds, pipes, etc) that can guide the pilot and help him follow the desired flight line.||Assets that lack visual features to guide the pilot.|
Source provided by Flyability.